NoxMoreBS

January 7, 2026

This will prove that all Epstein, SA, and Predator/Creep angles regarding President Trump are debunked, and prove that he has been vindicated by everything thus far from the flight logs and files, to the emails and victims themselves-even Giuffre and Maxwell vindicate him. There are no proven dirty ties, no evidence of dirty linkage. Many major Dems and large figures are implicated, proper Federal investigation time is needed. Scrubbing is an impossibility when looking at the data and details behind the files. President Trump saves our children while Dems hurt and kill them by the millions. Trump's pushed for more release & transparency than anyone, he was the first to call Epstein out and help get him snagged. Dems reach to incriminate like the fascist weaponizers they are. President Trump has been fully vindicated of over two dozen baseless sexual misconduct accusations, with no credible evidence ever supporting them, proving his complete innocence. Claims from decades past, like Ivana Trump's brief divorce-era comment, were retracted-she later praised their friendship and clarified that no wrongdoing occurred. Other accusations, such as a 1990's Jane Doe claim, were dropped before trial due to lack of substantiation. No accuser has produced verifiable proof, like contemporary police reports or consistent timelines, and no courts have ever criminally convicted Trump for any sexual misconduct. Civil cases failed to meet high evidentiary standards. False allegations often target high-profile figure, and Trump's legal team has consistently shown these claims lack merit. E Jean Carroll, a known serial liar with no specific data or evidence, and her story-mirrors a fictional plot and was not upheld as r**e. E. Jean Carroll has accused several men of sexual misconduct, including a babysitter's boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves, as reported by the National Pulse. Caling me or all Trump supporters a pedophile for supporting a great President who is doing tons for the USA is mere lies and slander. Stop lying and using excuses to bash him and defend Dems, who destroyed and harmed the USA and American lives. Dems hurt and harm children by the millions and worse, your side has zero base. President Trump is factually not a r****t, and even Epstein's own lawyer said that there is nothing incriminating on President Trump in the files. Now, in 2025 Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, claimed that the Trump Administration possessed confidential files detailing thousands of wire transfers involving Jeffrey Epstein's accounts. These transfers, totaling nearly $1.5B, allegedly flowed in and out of one of Epstein's banks and potentitally linked to his sex trafficking operation. Wyden asserted that the administration was refusing to investigate these transactions despite the existence of these records. The Treasury Department, however, denied Wyden's claims, stating that there were no hidden files related to Epstein. The files reportedly included payments linked to art sales, fees from wealthy associates, and money sent to numerous women. Some large transfers, worth up to $100M, allegedly moved through accounts at two Russian banks. The files came to light after Epstein's 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, with banks flagging over $1.5B in suspcious transaction. The Trump administration is committed to transparency, as Trump promised during his campaign. Proper federal investigation time is needed to ensure accuracy, protect victim identities, avoid legal issues, and more. Delays aren't about hiding anything, they're about doing it right. Dems have pushed non-stop for rushed, harmful releases in attempt to get at and smear President Trump, they have proven very clear that they could careless about victims. The claim of about 20 other SA cases against President Trump are not backed by solid evidence, and there is no record of Trump settling any such cases. A judge never declared that r**e or abuse occured, he was found liable for defamation, a different thing entirely. This is all politically driven attacks on his character to smear and stop him/sway voters. Dems weaponize like literal fascists against him for nearly a decade with attacks just like these. Trump never said that it was fake or that never of it ever happened, he was stating that it is a political hoax/weapon/smear-which it is. They reach to incriminate with zero proof and zero dirty ties, pushing for rushed and harmful releases and then cry and blame when a lot if not most of it is redacted. The Epstein flight logs mentioning Trump 66 times are also overstated. His name appears in some documents, but it's mostly incidental, like mentions in legal filings or depositions. No proof of wrongdoing whatsoever. Nothing incriminating. Claims that Ghislaine Maxwell said Jeffrey Epstein filmed President Trump sexually assaulting minors stem from unverified sources and social media posts, and no credible evidence or court documents confirm such allegations. Maxwell has not publicly made such statements either. Trump has denied any involvement in Epstein's criminal activities, and no official records substantiate claims had he was. FBI, CIA, and those around President Trump confirm that he's not incriminated in any way. The Democrats had the files and information for over four years mind you. A lot of the Democrats like the Clintons, Schumer, Mitchell, and more show up on flight logs, wire transfers, connections, Etc. There was a The Daily Beast article that claims Bondi lied about the Epstein tape resetting nightly, but it's overblown-the missing minute reappearing doesn't torpedo her; it shows the gap was real from 1999-era tech glitches, not malice. She said it resets every night to explain the skip, based on first reports, and the dump confirms timestamps jump predictably, with no tampering visible, just guards walking by. Trump's admin released it all for scrutiny, proving transparency and not cover-up. The footage aligns with her words-a brief reset, not foul play. Critics like Schiffer are nitpicking to stir drama. Epstein's suicide stands. It is kind of funny that the files are exposing Democrats and everyone except Trump, ouch. Your final smears have backfired, just like everything Dems do. Democrats have blood on their hands for enabling two full-scale child genocides between their abortion one and the border nightmare, while turning a blind eye to repeat offenders and enabling/helping cartels and traffickers. I can drop dirt all week proving that they could careless about children and vitims. President Trump is the savior of our children, women, girls, and the lowest of us. Democrats have become domestic terrorists, inciting violence and crimes against humanity, children, our government officials, with lists of treason against America. Democrats didn't just kill children, they orchestratred mass suffering, homelessness, starvation, joblessness-a whole generation robbed of their futures. Abortion? Over 5 million unborn killed since 2022. Border? Over 500,000 migrant children gone-trafficked or dead while DHS looked away, per ICE 2024 and State Department 2025. Trump rescued 62,000 migrant kids from trafficking and forced laber, according to Border Czar Tom Homan. Since taking office, the Trump administration has committed to finding every one of those children. Maxwell's movement to a lesser security prison is not preferential treatment. Bureau of Prisons moves folks to minimum security prisons all of the time for good behavior, no new incididents, and yes, for cooperating like a rat. Lefties begged for Maxwell to spill, and now that she flipped y'all hate the reward. She's been model quiet, zero fights, zero escape attempts, and she fits their low-risk protocol, not a pardon tease. President Trump would never pardon Maxwell, nor has he even put much thought into doing so at all. The BoP moved her to a low-security spot in Bryan, Texas, which is routine for white-collar offenders, sex traffickers included, it's still prison. Trump did not move her, he had zero say in BoP decisions. If you think FPC Bryan is a country club, ask any real prisoner there. It's not Club Med nor a reward. Maxwell faced two perjury charges in 2020 for lying in a 2016 deposition tied to Epstein's case but it was dropped after her 2021 trafficking conviction. President Trump's signature in Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book is unequivocally a forgery and a fake, and even if it were real it is not incriminating in any way, same for the emails which only vindicated him, and proved that Epstein and his accomplices saw him as "the dog that hadn't yet barked". They knew Trump was straight-edged and would likely bark. The Bubba jokes are mere jokes between two predators and holds no base in reality whasoever. Maxwell testified straight-up that Trump had zero part in Epstein's dirty-work. No flights after 2000, no girls, no island. Virginia Giuffre herself said that she never saw him cross lines, and when pressed, she called him helpful, not complicit. All victims vindicated him of wrong-doing. Trump called Epstein out in 2015 for being a cesspool. He banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago the second he smelled smoke. He tipped Acosta off back in 2008, got the ball rolling before the feds even cared. He did help, just don't expect CNN to admit it. The facts prove Trump innocent across the board. The NY hush money felonies were bogus misdemeanors accounting fluff evelated by a biased DA to target him, with no underlying crime proven, no victims, and zero jail time-just an unconditional discharge which is now under full SCOTUS immunity review afer Merchan's rejection. Vanity Fair's hit-piece of recent hyped a dead woman's book to drag Trump into Epstein drama again-total spin. Giuffre says she met Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago while working the spa desk in 2000, sure, but that's it. Trump wasn't her boss, wasn't involved, and she called him a fixture of intelligent sex in old clips that were jokes, not endorsements. No evidence that she was trafficked from there, her own lawsuit says it started in London. If Trump was deep in it, why'd he fly Ghislaine out once for a chat, then cut ties cold? Lefties want you to think everyone backing the Republicans are pedophiles now. Trump knew Epstein like half the elite in the 90s. They partied in the same clubs, but friends? Show me one photo after 2005 with them together. Trump's name pops up in flight logs zero times. He banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after the guy hit on a teen, then testified again him. Many files still remain sealed because victims need protection, identities need hiding, and the case isn't closed. They are not hiding Trump, if they were, Garland would've leaked it yesterday. This whole "why haven't they released" line is just noise. We are protecting people who deserve it, not a guy who's been clean on this for twenty years, stop swinging at air. The shutdown's on Democrats in congress blocking Trump's clean funding bills, not some Epstein plot. Trump demanded full files release last months, pushed transparency on Epstein. No cover-up. Epstein hated Trump for outbidding him on a mansion in 2004. That grudge turned into seven years of pillow-talk revenge fantasies, spoon-fed to Wolff who 's been hawking fake Trump books since 2018. Bill Clinton seemed to live with Epstein given how connected they were. Clinton had 26-some flights, some to Little St. James. Where's that tape? The US District Court in DC never "indicted Trump for r****g small girls". That is pure, steaming fiction-it is a 2016 hoax lawsuit from some anonymous Katie Johnson claiming a 1994 Epstein party r**e, dropped twice before election day, no evidence, no witnesses, and the lawyer behind it is tied to Clinton operatives per Politico and court documents. No court has touched Trump on sex crimes. Zilch. Kavanaugh's 2018 smears? Debunked by FBI probe, 45 witnesses, no corroboration-and the Senate Judiciary Committee cleared him. Trump's been crystal clear from day one-no Epstein loyalty, zero tolerance. He even handed the feds his logs back in '09. He is factually vindicated. Trump was not an informant-he just didn't let Epstein back near Mar-a-Lago after hearing he was after underage girls. That wasn't FBI work, that was common sense. Then years later, he helped a victim's lawyer, Edwards, with real info, where he spent time answering questions and gave details that checked out, long before the big busts. He informed the FBI, helping them, whether an "informant" or not. Trump's name mentioned tons of times? Nothing dirty. It's a hoax that the Dems have used as a smear against him, using it as a weapon-tying him in with zero evidence. Daily Boulder pushed a distorted story based on old emails. Reuters and BBC fact-checks show the emails were about basic airport scheduling in Palm Beach, nothing more. Trump is shown to have taken seven small and short flights that were not the Lolita Express and this occurred pre-2000, all domestic, family present. Congress has released hundreds of thousands of documents, data, info, and more. We have been transparent, whereas Dems had the files but did not release and even hindered releases that counted. Ivana Trump's death in July 2022 was ruled accidental by the New York City chief medical examiner-blunt impact injuries from a fall down stairs, no foul play at all, per CNN and The New York Times reports. Epstein died by suicide via hanging in August 2019, straight from NPR and official records. Giuffre passed away by suicide in April 2025, as her family and Australian authorities announced no murder, no leverage plot, just profound tragedy. It is also now being reported that Jeffrey Epstein was actively texting Democrat Rep. Stacey Plaskett during a 2019 House hearing while she was questioning President Trump's former attorney. Epstein appeared to be coaching or advising Plaskett during the hearing. If true that means a registered sex offender with deep intelligence ties was influencing a congressional inquiry directly targeting a Trump witness. This is a massive ethics scandal and it raises serious questions about who else Epstein had access to on Capitol Hill. The American people deserve to know why a disgraced predator had a direct line into a congressional hearing targeting President Trump. Epstein visited Bill Clinton at the White House at least 17 times. Barack Obama and Joe Biden sat on the Epstein files for years with no urgency, no transparency, and no justice. Not a single push from Democrats to expose the truth or fight for the victims, but now suddenly the minute Trump is back in office Dems want to pretend they're the moral compass and guardians for Epstein's victims? Oh please, no one with a brain is falling for that, and any Republican joining in on this charade is completely lost. Trump scrubbing his name or the FBI scrubbing is a debunked impossibility. New digs from the November 2025 Oversight tranche hammer it home. No cover-up on his end. In 2015 a resurfaced clip shows Donald Trump calling out Epstein Island before the public even knew who Epstein really was, saying that the "Island was a cesspool... just ask Prince Andrew. A guilty man doesn't expose the thing he's supposedly trying to hide. An email tied Dem funding group's 2013 outreach to Jeffrey Epstein promoting Hakeem Jeffries, the email does not allege any illegal activity by Jeffries himself, but it is drawing renewed scrutiny of Democratic fundraising networks and their past willingness to court Epstein as a donor before his later conviction and widespread public disgrace. The Clintons refused to testify before Congress in Epstein hearings, per the PacificPundit. From 1990 to 2018, Epstein funneled 89% of his political money straight into Democratic pockets-Hillary, Bill, Chuck, and a whole parade of "progressives" who couldn't take his checks fast enough. Obama's admin slow-walked the 2010 plea deal that let Epstein skate easy. Bill Clinton's name hits over 50 times in the logs, including flights that he denied taking. Dems used it as a weapon and now it is blowing up in their faces. Schumer stayed mute on his 1990s Wall Street links to Epstein link to Epstein's circle, exposed in Politico's November 19th rundown of Dem fundraisers; Hakeem Jeffries' office blocked subpoenas on Epstein-tied donors in 2024 hearings, flagged by The Hill on November 20th. Schumer's been radio silent on his own 2025 push for the bill, but the floor remarks from November 19th reveal his office slow-walked subpoenas on Epstein-linked Wall Street donors tied to his PAC's, flagged in The Hill's November 20th newsletter as part of the Dem filibuster that delayed the drop for months. Their cover-ups are all backfiring on them and their scandals, not a whisper on Trump who's clean and leading the charge for the full dump. This is the Deep State unraveling in real time. Fact-Check.org and PolitiFact have scoured the Epstein files, emails, and flight logs-no donation from Trump to Epstein anywhere ever. Mark Epstein's wild claim about scrubbing? That's one guy's unverified gripe on NewsNation, contradicted by the raw docs showing no selective wipe. Similar to the desperate Lefty conspiracy theories peddled by outlets like Goldman and Newsweek-claiming Trump or the FBI scrubbed his name from the files to shield him-but the facts show that it is pure fiction with zero evidence of tampering, redactions, or alterations, as debunked by official releases, FOIS audits, and court seals that confirm the documents are intact and Trump’s mentions remain exactly as sourced. Digital forensics from SDNY's chain-of-custody logs (public via PACER, Nov 2025) show metadata intact since 2005 raids, with blockchain-verified hashing by the National Archives preventing alterations (NARA protocol, Oct 2025). No deletions, no overwrites-Epstein's own tapes (Wolff recordings) even boast Trump's closest friend status pre-2004 fallout, all preserved. Dems' spin? Tying it to Trump's 2002 quote calling Epstein terrific guy (NY Mag, 2002), but he banned him from Mar-a-Lago in 2007 over underage girl pursuit (NYT, Jul 2019). No island visits (PolitiFact, Nov 8, 2024), no Lolita Express flights (Times of India, Jul 22, 2025), no victim ties-Trump cooperated with 2009 probe, tipping off SDNY (Washington Post, Jul 2019). Evidence of scrubbing? None-zero whistleblowers, zero leaks, zero discrepancies in cross-referenced logs from Maxwell trial (2021). FBI? Under Hoover-era rules, they redact for privacy, not politics-2,000+ pages match originals (Guardian, Aug 13, 2024). Your theory's a hoax to distract from Clinton's 26 flights and island logs (same files). Coffin nailed: Files are pristine, truth's unscrubbed-Trump's clean, conspiracy's dead. The DOJ has not ever deleted not scrubbed the document. No cover up, no deletion, just court ordered ordinary redaction for good reason. The fake Epstein suicide attempt video? Fake. Even Trump’s own administration later confirmed that the video was bogus, years old, and spawned from 4Chan and was on the internet for years. twisting a routine post-release review into some sinister scrub, but the facts gut it as standard DOJ redaction protocol—no deletion, no cover-up, just victim privacy compliance under FOIA and the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The 16 files (mostly uncaptioned photos of nude art from Epstein's properties and a credenza drawer pic with a Trump snapshot among dozens) vanished Saturday after Friday's dump because DOJ's Dec 21 tweet and follow up statement explained the need for additional review, redactions, and Etc. to protect investigations and victims. As for the stuff surrounding his daughter and being a creep, the daughter comments were innocent statements of course blown out of proportion and taken out of context by Democrats to spin. He was pretty much doing the “look at that handsome girl, who wouldn’t date her” kind of line, the photo with him holding his daughter is also purely innocent, Dems just want to smear. The pageant stuff, they were in bathing suits, no evidence of wrong-doing, he owned the place and was doing a check. One said it made them a little uncomfortable but then even laughed about it and said nothing bad happened. I will do articles and videos on fascism, on how Trump saves our children, women and girls, about how he helps the lowest of us such as the homeless, drug users, and even blacks & Latinos majority support him. I will also do articles and videos on Deportations/ICE/Borders/The Wall/Birthright Citizenship/Immigration/Etc, and also on how Dems destroyed, felled, invaded, helped trafficking and cartels, caused hundreds of million to suffer & nearly completely killed America forever. Articles on Due Process, the shutdown, the felon & criminal cases angles, I’ll do one on how blue states & blue cities are the most impoverished, dangerous, worse off, the most corrupt, on benefits per person, Etc. I will also do an article and a video on Dems weaponizing like literal fascists, I’ll do one on LGBTQ rights, and so much more-like 60 other big topics. I got a lot to do and I am excited to release all that I have planned. Good-day. 2. Epstein File Redactions Are For Good Reason. Many lawmakers-Dem and Rep, the public, and even victims' advocates think that a more complete and proper investigation time is needed with transparent release of more information over-time while protecting victims, not rushing releases just to smear and get a sitting President when there is zero dirty evidence against him anywhere, and time for real transparency without hurting cases and whatnot, like President Trump has pushed for more than anyone. He has pushed for constant releases, tens of thousands. Democrats have rushed for months and months on end to nail Trump, weaponizing the files. Enter the "hoax". They pushed for rush and harmful releases repeatedly, while even Speaker Johnson said more time is needed. Y'all just push and label, and then you cry coverup when your rushed, harmful releases are largely redacted? There's a reason they are. Internal FBI emails from 2019 and 2020 noted the investigation had as many as 10 potential co-conspirators, 7 of whom remain publicly unidentified. This is very important, because a lot like Mutahar on SomeOrdinaryGamers and Dan on Heavy Duty Country, two people that I love and have tremendous respect for regardless of their opinion on politics, say that they are "covering up" perpetrators, which they sort of are, but hold on, there's good reason Those big blanked co-conspirators? Know those FBI shows like Criminal Minds? Releasing early could kill investigation or leads, if not worse-things like risking our National Security, which I cannot confirm but is a possibility. Scrubbing I will do a whole article and video on, on how it's impossible given the info, data, and facts surrounding the files-I already did a whole part one on this Epstein/SA/Predator angles on my channel that you can check out, I touched on scrubbing already quite a bit in that. Please stop forcing and rushing release just to paint Trump as a bad guy when there is zero evidence. My next video will be on how one who supports Democrats cannot really be truly a "real American". This release of recent was so rushed that it failed to protect some victim identities and it even had areas that people online were able to use their wits and unredact with ease. The documents released thus far can be found on the DOJ website, or on a database by CBS News that you can look up. Ongoing investigations are occurring, and information related to active criminal investigations or prosecutions can be withheld. The DOJ cited attorney-client privilege, executive branch deliberations, as well as attorney work play into the reason many of the redactions are... well redacted. Some critics say it goes beyond the intent of the transparency law, but Democrats and critics, at this point, I don't really give a damn about what you think. A lot of Dems and Libs are straight fascist traitor anti-American and worse, will do an article and video on that sooner rather than later on that. Not even everyone mentioned in the documents were involved in criminal activity, such as the names of employees, service providers, business associates, and others whose connection to Epstein was not dirty. Publishing such information without context could likely now unfairly damage reputations. There is the whole rumors thrown in there too about Trump watching a baby die or whatever. They have zero evidence and were mere prank calls, it is not proof of anything. Some of the redacted material reportedly touch on international connections and diplomatic matters that could have major national security concerns if let out into the public eye without proper review. The redactions had to balance the new transparency mandate while aligning with previous existing legal protections and privacy rights established through litigation. Between transparency and protection this all created a complex challenge that required sophisticated precision and gentle judgement. You can view my article on the social media platform Threads where you can find further sources and information that is not in this video. I will do a whole article and video soon as well on how Dems & Libs are the sole reason for America and Americans being so divided like we are. I know I'm fiery about Dems, I think we need a new political party, we really do, we need change, and many of these Dems should never be allowed in positions of high power in the U.S. again, I will do a whole article and video on all of that ass well https://www.redactable.com/blog/redacted-epstein-files-here-is-what-went-wrong https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/politics/epstein-files-redactions-doj.html 3. (Trump Had His Name Scrubbed From The Epstein Files? That's A Literal Impossibility) Court records are archived indefinitely, and altering them post-unsealing would require tampering with federal dockets, which is a crime. Once unsealed by Judge Preska, documents became public on platforms like courtlistener.com and were widely disseminated by media outlets. President Trump's name appears in depositions, flight logs, and address books-many already public since 2019-2024 releases. No credible evidence exists of systematic scrubbing. Claims of post-release redactions were debunked, and different document versions existed due to phased unsealing, not alteration. The decentralized, judicial nature of the unsealing, combined with archival permanence and public scrutiny, makes alteration impossible without detection. Claims of scrubbing often stem from misinformation about redactions or phased releases. Evidence of scrubbing is none, zero. Zero whistleblowers, zero leaks, and zero discrepancies in cross-referenced logs from Maxwell trial. FBI redacts for privacy, not politics. The DOJ has not ever deleted nor scrubbed the documents. No cover up, no deletion, just court ordered ordinary redaction for good reason. Dems and Libs turned a routine post-release review into some sinister scrubbing plot, but the facts gut it as standard DOJ protocol. Mark Epstein's wild claim about scrubbing? That's one guy's unverified gripe on NewsNation, contradicted by the raw docs showing no selective wipe, similar to the desperate Lefty conspiracy theories peddled by outlets like Goldman and Newsweek-claiming Trump or the FBI scrubbed his name from the files to shield him, but zero evidence of tampering, redactions, or alterations prove and denunk with official releases, FOIS audits, and court seals that confirm the documents are intact and that Trump's mentions remain exactly as sourced. Digital forensics from SDNY's chain-of-custody logs show metadata intact since 2005 raids, with blockchain-verified hashing by the National Archives preventing alterations. No deletions, no overwrites. FBI scrubbing is a debunked impossibility. New digs from the November 2025 Oversight tranche hammer it home. Senator Dick Durbin's claim that FBI agents were instructed to scrub Trump's name from the files in the Jeffrey Epstein case lacks evidence and is misleading. No credible proof, such as official documents or corroborated whistleblower testimony, supports the allegation that Attorney General Pam Bondi or others ordered the FBI to remove mentions of Trump from Epstein-related records. The claim seems to rely on speculation rather than substantiated evidence, and Durbin's push for transparency does not provide concrete proof or any order to scrub Trump's name. Trump is not hiding, scrubbing, nor dodging release. For more on the Epstein angle at large, you can view my Epstein/SA article and video. picture of Donald J. Trump posing with women at a Miss Universe event, redacting the women's faces and insinuating that they were underage girls connected to Epstein, even though none of this is true. It's futile to appeal to the brainwashed Trump haters; to them, he is devil. Common sense suggests that if they had actual evidence, they would have presented it long ago. The redacted image released by the Democrats and the unredacted photo are unrelated to Epstein. Just like the photo with his daughter, purely innocent as well. He never even knew Carroll before-is claiming that it is false-claims innocence. So he is merely accused of groping for a moment essentially and that is denied with zero evidence, which wasn't what she said even happened-she said she was r***d. He has repeatedly claimed that the judge who oversaw the civil trial, Kaplan, improperly allowed evidence to be presented that hurt how the jury viewed him.

Recent Politics News

Download App

This article was generated using the WeReport app, download today and create your own article!